Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Archive
Archive
Python
Alternative decorator syntax - POLL RESULTS SO FAR - ARE WE DONE?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Nicolas Chauvat, post: 1775112"] Hi, Here is my vote, in case it can still be included. C2 C2 J2 Concerning the choice of the keyword, I'd vote *against* decorate and for something like predef (J2), with (C2, J2), using (C2). Concerning the @-thingy, it's the worst proposal I have ever heard concerning Python. Sounds too cryptic to be true... must be a joke. I'd like to add that the EuroPython poll was clearly in favor of *not* using the @thing in front of functions and that this poll results also said that people would rather not include the "decorator" feature in the next release than include it as described. Last but not least, the best option would IMHO not to implement so-called decorators without thinking seriously about what they are supposed to do exactly, as title 7 says at [URL]http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecorators[/URL] In other words "it's getting urgent to wait". [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Archive
Archive
Python
Alternative decorator syntax - POLL RESULTS SO FAR - ARE WE DONE?
Top