[ANN] mahoro-0.1

S

Shu-yu Guo

Mahoro is a (very) simple and straightforward interface to the libmagic
interface, a C library to the well known file(1). It is released in the
Public Domain and may be downloaded from:

http://www.rufuran.org/mahoro.html

It contains an extremely lacking test suite, but is otherwise
functional. On the topic of functionality, it contains a
rather-nonfunctional name; I derived it from Magic -> Mahou -> Mahoro.

A reference is provided for on the website linked above.
 
I

Ian Macdonald

Mahoro is a (very) simple and straightforward interface to the libmagic
interface, a C library to the well known file(1). It is released in the
Public Domain and may be downloaded from:

http://www.rufuran.org/mahoro.html

It contains an extremely lacking test suite, but is otherwise
functional. On the topic of functionality, it contains a
rather-nonfunctional name; I derived it from Magic -> Mahou -> Mahoro.

A reference is provided for on the website linked above.

Do you know of any significant differences between your library and this
one?

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/filemagic/

Ian
--
Ian Macdonald | Can anything be sadder than work left
System Administrator | unfinished? Yes, work never begun.
(e-mail address removed) |
http://www.caliban.org |
|
 
S

Shu-yu Guo

Do you know of any significant differences between your library and
this
one?

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/filemagic/

Oops, I didn't know that existed (I guess I wasn't very thorough in my
search). It was a very simple thing to code, so I decided to release it
after I wrote it. There are no significant differences except in that
what I wrote seems a bit more complete: you can set flags, check
validity of databases, and so forth. There is no compelling reason to
use one over the other, I'm sorry I didn't know someone already wrote
an interface.

For what it's worth, I released mine in the PD. :)
 
I

Ian Macdonald

Oops, I didn't know that existed (I guess I wasn't very thorough in my
search). It was a very simple thing to code, so I decided to release it
after I wrote it. There are no significant differences except in that
what I wrote seems a bit more complete: you can set flags, check
validity of databases, and so forth. There is no compelling reason to
use one over the other, I'm sorry I didn't know someone already wrote
an interface.

Thanks for the information. I was going to write an extension to do this
myself, then saw that someone had already done it. Then, I saw that you
had just written an alternative implementation, so I wondered which of
the two I should use.

Thanks,

Ian
--
Ian Macdonald | Sex and mathematics have one thing in
System Administrator | common. You can do each while thinking
(e-mail address removed) | about the other.
http://www.caliban.org |
|
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Picat Stable Version 0.1 Released 0
[ANN] ditz 0.1 Released 0
[ANN] rglpk 0.1 Released 0
[ANN] rs 0.1 3
[ANN] Design tool Jeszra 0.1 for Ruby Tk 3
[ANN] filepath 0.1 0
[ANN] gonzui-emacs-0.1 0
[ANN] Ruby-VPI 0.1 0

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,145
Messages
2,570,826
Members
47,373
Latest member
Desiree036

Latest Threads

Top