S
Shawn B.
Greetings,
We have a very large web application (300+ pages) (insurance software) that
was ported from ASP.NET 1.1 to 2.0 via the Web Application Project add-in.
There are some pages that the postbacks inexplicably don't function as
intended. What happens is the postbacks do one of two things: 1) they act
like a redirect and request the same page losing the query string parameters
and the IsPostBack registers as false or 2) the attempt to do a proper
postback but the ASP.NET engine throws an exception stating something to the
effect of there not being a postback event handler or something (I don't
remember the details).
With regards to #1, the only way to correct the problem I've found thus far
is to create the page from scratch and not copy/paste any of the HTML. But
that isn't feasible, there are too many pages and these pages are
complicated pieces of "art" such that it is impracticle to rewrite the
entire application.
Does anyone here know what the cause of the problem is and perhaps a better
way to solve it?
Thanks,
Shawn
We have a very large web application (300+ pages) (insurance software) that
was ported from ASP.NET 1.1 to 2.0 via the Web Application Project add-in.
There are some pages that the postbacks inexplicably don't function as
intended. What happens is the postbacks do one of two things: 1) they act
like a redirect and request the same page losing the query string parameters
and the IsPostBack registers as false or 2) the attempt to do a proper
postback but the ASP.NET engine throws an exception stating something to the
effect of there not being a postback event handler or something (I don't
remember the details).
With regards to #1, the only way to correct the problem I've found thus far
is to create the page from scratch and not copy/paste any of the HTML. But
that isn't feasible, there are too many pages and these pages are
complicated pieces of "art" such that it is impracticle to rewrite the
entire application.
Does anyone here know what the cause of the problem is and perhaps a better
way to solve it?
Thanks,
Shawn