ASP Treeview and mozilla

[Ed]

http://aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2311

Sample: http://aspfaq.com/treeview

This works perfectly on Windows IE 6.x and Mac IE.

However, in order to be cross-platform compatible, I need to make this work
on Mac Safari and Mozilla Firefox. Could someone point out how to fix this
code to make it compatible with those aforementioned browsers?

Thank you.

 

[Ed]

It does not expand the treeview upon clicking the [+] on the "root" folder.
This is happening on Mac Safari and Mozilla Firefox.

 

[Aaron Bertrand - MVP]

Does http://www.aspfaq.com/treeview2/ work?

 

[Ed]

Yes!

What was the problem? And could you update your FAQ example with this?

Thanks!

 

[Bob Lehmann]

The first one says it has only been tested in IE. If you take a look at
treeview.js for each of them you'll see why the first one doesn't work in
non-IE browsers.

Bob Lehmann

 

[Aaron Bertrand - MVP]

What was the problem? And could you update your FAQ example with this?

Yes, way ahead of you. I was using an onmousedown event on a <div> and
Mozilla doesn't get it, so I switched to an <a>

 

[Dave Anderson]

Yes, way ahead of you. I was using an onmousedown event on a <div>
and Mozilla doesn't get it, so I switched to an <a>

There's a bit more to it than that, as the JavaScript console warns:

Error: document.all is not a function
Source File: http://aspfaq.com/treeview/treeview.js
Line: 3




--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms. Please do not contact
me directly or ask me to contact you directly for assistance. If your
question is worth asking, it's worth posting.

 

[Aaron Bertrand - MVP]

You must be seeing a cached version. If you load that js file directly, and
save it locally, you will see that there is no longer any reference to
document.all.

--
Aaron Bertrand
SQL Server MVP
http://www.aspfaq.com/

 

[Dave Anderson]

You must be seeing a cached version. If you load that js file
directly, and save it locally, you will see that there is no longer
any reference to document.all.

I had never looked at it before this thread, so any caching wasn't mine. I
do note that it is fixed now, however.



--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms. Please do not contact
me directly or ask me to contact you directly for assistance. If your
question is worth asking, it's worth posting.