Attn. C gurus

[please]

I need your help with the thread "Understanding ++"

TIA.

 

[Joona I Palaste]

(e-mail address removed) scribbled the following:

I need your help with the thread "Understanding ++"

What sort of help do you need? Can't you find the thread? Or do you
have trouble reading it? Or don't you understand anything written in it?

--
/-- Joona Palaste ([email protected]) ---------------------------\
| Kingpriest of "The Flying Lemon Tree" G++ FR FW+ M- #108 D+ ADA N+++|
| http://www.helsinki.fi/~palaste W++ B OP+ |
\----------------------------------------- Finland rules! ------------/
"Make money fast! Don't feed it!"
- Anon

 

[Kris Wempa]

Do you mean that you are having trouble understanding the "++" increment
operator or you are having trouble understanding the C++ language ?


I need your help with the thread "Understanding ++"

TIA.

 

[Mike Wahler]

I need your help with the thread "Understanding ++"

Then post a question in that thread.

-Mike

 

[enough]

Then post a question in that thread.

Ok stop it guys.
Robert Stankowic gave me the answer.

 

[Mike Wahler]

Ok stop it guys.

Stop what? Educating folks on how to best benefit
from the newsgroup?

-Mike

 

[Keith Thompson]

Ok stop it guys.
Robert Stankowic gave me the answer.

It looks like you've recently posted with at least 3 different "From:"
headers: "(e-mail address removed)", "(e-mail address removed)", and "(e-mail address removed)".
There are probably more, but it's hard to tell. If you don't want to
put your real e-mail address in the header, that's ok; a lot of people
mask their addresses to avoid spammers. (Actually the practice is
controversial, but I won't get into that here.)

But if you're going to participate in discussions, please don't use a
different phony return address for each article you post. Pick a
single pseudonym and stick to it so we can tell that all your articles
come from the same person, even if we don't know who you are.

Also, if you're going to use an invalid return address, choose one
that's really invalid. Both help.com and perth.com actually exist;
ehougd.com doesn't, but it could (and enough.com does). By faking
addresses at real sites, you could be inadvertently causing innocent
third parties at those sites to be bombarded with spam.

The domain names example.com, example.net, and example.org are
guaranteed not to exist. You can also use an invalid suffix, such as
nosuchsite.invalid.