Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Larry Hewitt, post: 1508134"] Hmmm. Let's see. There is the Oregon prosecuter (French) who admits he lied on his affadavit. There is Eliot who praised him in Nam, praised Kerry in 1996, then signed an affadavit against him, took it back, took back the take back, then went into hiding. Or Hoffman, who recommended him for medals and said his tactics were aggressive and innovative, and now is against Kerry. Or how about Thurlow, who claims there was no enemy fire, yet his own medal commendation and his coxswain says HE was under fire. Thurlow claims to have never read his commendation --- riiight. How about Schachte? Claims to have been on a 3 man Boston Whaler with Kerry during one incident, and disputes Kerry's version of events. But he cannot produce documentation to show he was there - he was not assigned to the boat. Nor can he name the third crewman. But two crewmen who WERE assigned to the boat - and know each other and Kerry - back up Kerry's story and say THEY were there. Or the biggest liar of them all - O'Neill. First he claims he was in Nam with Kerry - but he showed up two months after Kerry left. Next he denies any ties to republican politicing - yet he worked with Charles Colson on Nixon's dirty tricks squad in 1971, and has worked for repuglicons snce then. Then he says Kerry could not have been in Cambodia because no one went to Cambodia. But O'Neill told Nixon he was in Cambodia. Now he says he was really 100 yards from the border - not the 50 miles he said when he called Kerry a liar. But mostly it is the word of people who were not there being contradicted by the word of people who were there. Larry [/QUOTE]

Verification