Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Juha Nieminen, post: 4401717"] I think I know what happened here. When someone said that an object file contains compiled machined code, you erroneously thought that he meant that an object file is directly executable as-is. Thus in your typical sociopath manner you loudly and proudly objected to the notion. Later you perhaps realized your mistake (in other words, object files do typically contain compiled machine code, which the linker uses to build the final executable), but now it's too late, you can't admit your mistake and now you are, as usual, making a fool of yourself trying to weasel yourself out of yet another situation, but only digging a deeper and deeper hole. This became pretty clear when you opposed the claim that executable files are also modified at startup by the OS (using a so-called dynamic linker, which sets far jump and system function addresses appropriately), and hence are in this sense somewhat similar to object files. If you had made a wikipedia search for "dynamic linker" and read the article instead of spouting nonsense, you would have saved yourself yet another instance of embarrassment, but of course that kind of behavior is impossible for you. [/QUOTE]