M
mechanicfem
Lately I've been trying to learn about new stuff in c99 - today's topic
was/is variable length arrays.
As well as asking here, I've been 'doing the rounds' via Google, and
recently I found this article:
http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=cplusplus&seqNum=215
It didn't help me much re my earlier question about using [*]
However, could someone tell me if this article is /reasonable/?
For example, the article mentions variadic macros, and __VA_ARGS__ -
however, I cannot find __VA_ARGS__ in the draft ISO spec I have, and so
I wonder if it's genuine?
I've also noted a couple of things that don't make sense that 'make me
wonder' about its quality, e.g.,
struct Employee
{
....
}
Followed by (note the missing /struct/)
Employee emp = {.ID=0, .record=NULL};
I guess my question really is - where can I find examples of /new/ c99
features, c/w readable descriptions?
x
Jo
was/is variable length arrays.
As well as asking here, I've been 'doing the rounds' via Google, and
recently I found this article:
http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=cplusplus&seqNum=215
It didn't help me much re my earlier question about using [*]
However, could someone tell me if this article is /reasonable/?
For example, the article mentions variadic macros, and __VA_ARGS__ -
however, I cannot find __VA_ARGS__ in the draft ISO spec I have, and so
I wonder if it's genuine?
I've also noted a couple of things that don't make sense that 'make me
wonder' about its quality, e.g.,
struct Employee
{
....
}
Followed by (note the missing /struct/)
Employee emp = {.ID=0, .record=NULL};
I guess my question really is - where can I find examples of /new/ c99
features, c/w readable descriptions?
x
Jo