CDO Mail / Outlook Template

[CReds]

OK, I am little down right now.
We have spent the better part of six months getting our website programmed
and tested. We finally went live last week.

This week, we get a e-mail from another department stating we must submit
reports via a Outlook Template. This is a good thing overall. The website
I have, pretty much asks the same questions as they want, but they want us
to use the template. Can I incorporate the template using CDO somehow?

Any assistance is much appreciated.

 

[Evertjan.]

CReds wrote on 21 jun 2005 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:

.. we must submit reports via a Outlook Template.
This is a good thing overall.

I disagree.

Email should only have pertinent textual content.

All other should be in an attachment.

 

[CReds]

OK, that really doesn't answer my question.

CReds wrote on 21 jun 2005 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:

I disagree.

Email should only have pertinent textual content.

All other should be in an attachment.

 

[Evertjan.]

CReds wrote on 21 jun 2005 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
[please do not topquote]

OK, that really doesn't answer my question.

Sure, it is a reaction on your statement:
"This is a good thing overall."

 

[Roland Hall]

: CReds wrote on 21 jun 2005 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
: > : >> CReds wrote on 21 jun 2005 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:
: >> > .. we must submit reports via a Outlook Template.
: >> > This is a good thing overall.
: >>
: >> I disagree.
: >>
: >> Email should only have pertinent textual content.
: >>
: >> All other should be in an attachment.
:
: [please do not topquote]
:
: > OK, that really doesn't answer my question.

You're right, it doesn't. It's in opposition to your statement, "This is a
good thing overall." I'd say, with limited information, it's
undeterminable."

But you did say this also: "Any assistance is much appreciated."

--
Roland Hall
/* This information is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
without any warranty; without even the implied warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. */
Technet Script Center - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/
WSH 5.6 Documentation - http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/list/webdev.asp
MSDN Library - http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp

 

[Ken Jenkins]

thats because Evertjan like to lecture people about things instead of just
helping them

 

[Evertjan.]

Ken Jenkins wrote on 22 jun 2005 in
microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:

thats because Evertjan like to lecture people about things instead of
just helping them

Helping someone into the mud, Ken,
just because that is the way he/she says he/she wants to go?

Since the OP poses a statement "This is a good thing overall",
not wanting or expecting any commentary on that is not very reasonable.

Disputing a statement that is felt as incorrect is good usenet behavour.

More reasons for not agreeing with the Outlook Template as a good thing
have already been posted in this thread.

Usenet is about discussion, ususally helpfull, but the direction of the
help is not necessarily in the direction the OP expects.

If the OP does not like that, he/she better finds a paid helpdesk.