SteveP said:
JP requests context.
JP, Why don't you use a threaded news reader?
If you think that a threaded news reader solves the problems
introduced by not quoting context, then you don't yet
understand the propogation/administration of Usenet articles.
The followup may arrive at someone's news server *before* the
post that it is following up to.
The article that you are following up to may *never* arrive at
someone's news server.
The article that you are following up to may have expired, and
been dropped from someone's news server spool.
Having a threaded newsreader does not help in solving any
of those problems.
And even apart from the vagaries of NNTP, quoting no context
causes problems in the human realm.
For someone participating in 30 threads, what was said in which
thread to too much to keep in (grey matter) memory.
And even apart from the problems that quoting no context introduces
for NNTP and for other humans, it can create a problem for the
posting human himself.
Those 30-thread-at-a-time folks will simply go to the next thread
rather than spend the time to go recapture the context of the thread.
If they happened to know the answer, you won't end up getting it.
Who might these 30-thread-at-a-time folks be? They are very likely
the frequent-answerers, just the people you *want* to pay attention
to your problem!
And apart from all of those, no-quoting can hurt your chances of
getting answers to every _future_ Perl question that you may have...