Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SG, post: 4201748"] When he says "p is a pointer to a 1d array" he means "p currently stores an address of an array or the address of something that is part of that array". So, when he says "p is ..." he's mainly considering runtime properties and the raw type-agnostic address some object pointer stores. Unlike others, he ignores the type of a pointer variable when it comes to describing what a certain pointer "is". That's why he brought up the broken finger/bunch/banana analogy. Guys, don't you realize that this is going around in circles? Don't you have anything better to do? SG [/QUOTE]