Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Paul, post: 4202655"]
That is speaking about a pointer-type.
What part of  pointer-type don't you understand?

The type of pointer is not always what it points to,  especially with a void
pointer.

No its incorrect if you omit the word "type".
It's type is void pointer.

When a pointer is a pointer to X, X is the pointed to object, not the
pointer type.
When you say a pointer is type pointer to X, then there is a different
meaning implied altogether.

You INCORRECTLY use the former term , with the later definition.

You don't care about anything except YOU being right, even when you are
blatantly wrong.

You have once again been proven wrong and you are and always will be a
proven idiot. Why don't you go **** off back into yur hole or something and
stop speaking bullshit as usual :-)

A void pointer points to a void HAHA , you are such a fuckin moron Leigh.
Sometimes you really need to take a good look in the mirror and maybe bang
your head of it a few times. Not to hard though or you might break it. (the
mirror not your head)
[/QUOTE]

Verification