disregarding xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation?

[Jean-François Michaud]

Hello guys,

I was wondering if it was possible to disregard the
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation. For validation it's obviously easier to
have it point to say a local directory but the final
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation has to point to a specific location that
is not local. I was wondering if it was possible to make sure that the
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation points to the non local location, force
the parser to disregard the xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation and force it
to validate against a specific XSD in a location of our choice to
avoid having to tinker with the SchemaLocation XML attribute just for
the validation.

I'm using Saxon8

Any thoughts?

Regards
Jean-Francois Michaud

 

[Martin Honnen]

I was wondering if it was possible to disregard the
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation. For validation it's obviously easier to
have it point to say a local directory but the final
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation has to point to a specific location that
is not local. I was wondering if it was possible to make sure that the
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation points to the non local location, force
the parser to disregard the xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation and force it
to validate against a specific XSD in a location of our choice to
avoid having to tinker with the SchemaLocation XML attribute just for
the validation.

I'm using Saxon8

You might want to ask on the Saxon mailing list.
For the current release Saxon 9 the documentation is online here
<URL:http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/schema-processing/commandline.html>
and suggests that you can set the -xsd:file;file option the specify
schema documents to be used for validation.

 

[Jean-François Michaud]

You might want to ask on the Saxon mailing list.
For the current release Saxon 9 the documentation is online here
<URL:http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/schema-processing/commandline.html>
and suggests that you can set the -xsd:file;file option the specify
schema documents to be used for validation.

Super! Thanks for the input ;-).

Regards
Jean-Francois Michaud