do .. unless

[Josselin]

is there any better way to write that :

if !params[:qaddress].nil?
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

using a do.. unless ? something like that ??

cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end unless params[:qaddress].nil?

 

[Kevin Jackson]

how about:

unless params[:qaddress].nil?
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

Yeah it only gets rid of the if!, but I think it's more readable

Kev

 

[Robert Klemme]

how about:

unless params[:qaddress].nil?
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

Maybe this (untested):

params[:qaddress] and
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end

Kind regards

robert

 

[Devin Mullins]

is there any better way to write that :

if !params[:qaddress].nil?
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

using a do.. unless ? something like that ??

cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end unless params[:qaddress].nil?

Well, the unless modifier works here -- if qaddress is nil, cond_b is
set to nil. Here's another way:
cond_b = if params[:qaddress]
EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

Fnord

 

[atbusbook]

is there any better way to write that :

if !params[:qaddress].nil?
cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

using a do.. unless ? something like that ??

cond_b = EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end unless params[:qaddress].nil?

Well, the unless modifier works here -- if qaddress is nil, cond_b is
set to nil. Here's another way:
cond_b = if params[:qaddress]
EZ::Where::Condition.new roperties do
...
end
end

Fnord

<code>
begin
# do stuff
end while false
</code>
will be done once