Does the c++ language define the term "type"?

H

heideggm

I searched through recent drafts of the ISO/IEC standards for the c++ language and I couldn't find a short, formal definition of the term "type". Is it present somewhere or is the definition so universally known that it simply wasn't deemed necessary?
 
B

Bart van Ingen Schenau

I searched through recent drafts of the ISO/IEC standards for the c++
language and I couldn't find a short, formal definition of the term
"type". Is it present somewhere or is the definition so universally
known that it simply wasn't deemed necessary?

Given that there is an entire section devoted to types ([basic.types];
3.9 in C++03), I would go for a third possibility: It was deemed/found to
be impossible to create a succinct, yet accurate, formal definition of
the term "type".

Bart v Ingen Schenau
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,994
Messages
2,570,223
Members
46,813
Latest member
lawrwtwinkle111

Latest Threads

Top