Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Keith Thompson, post: 1676979"] The third program deliberately produces output that depends on implementation-defined behavior. If you want it to qualify as strictly conforming, then you're advocating radically changing the meaning of the term, not just fixing the definition. I wouldn't mind another conformance class, somewhere between "conforming" and "strictly conforming", that would cover this program, but I think that "strictly conforming" is (at least potentially) a useful enough concept that we don't want to weaken it too much. [/QUOTE]