Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="spinoza1111, post: 4031118"] * There were five bugs, all of which have been fixed in the first, and one of the few, solutions posted (the others were by io_x and willem, and not you). Those bugs are in the Change Record with the code for all too see and traceback * That bug list, and other forms of diligence seldom seen here or on the job, is why the code isn't twenty lines. If you take out the TESTER calls (which provide a reusable testing resources that competent participants in this discussion have found useful) and the comments there are fewer than one hundred lines and even fewer C statements, where the lines have been diligently formatted for readability. * You lack of standing was evident when you could not post a three line strlen replacement without a recruit-level error, and when you triggered this discussion by mistakenly thinking that the correct way to find the string %s is to find the character &, and punt...even when string.h provides string search. * My decision to abandon string.h was after years of using it, back in the day. It has a bad way of representing strings. [/QUOTE]