Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Seebs, post: 4031725"] Yes. But what makes him think that the term was EVER in "C:TCN"? I just went back to a 1998 saved copy on another machine, and the term was not there, either. So far as I can tell, the only changes since 1997 have been some HTML cleanup. (It's hard to be sure, because that cleanup was moderately invasive making diffs hard to generate, but a quick scan through a per-token diff shows nothing more elaborate than, say, changing the capitalization of tags and adding a DOCTYPE.) So Nilges has publically asserted that I used a term, and specifically that I used it in that document, but it wasn't so. Why is he so willing to resort to blatant (and easily-disproved) lies in order to prove a point? Because he's a kook. Nilges: You have to get this through your head. *YOUR MEMORY IS NOT RELIABLE.* You make stuff up and think it happened. You can't tell people apart. In the middle of a thread discussing your confusion between me and Peter Siebel, you then confused us again. You can't remember who said what, or when things happened. You need to get that looked at. Either something is physically wrong with your brain, preventing you from being able to tell what happened and what you imagined, or you are so blinded by obsession that you are lying to yourself on a truly epic scale. Either way, this is a problem for a competent health care professional, not one Usenet can help you with. -s [/QUOTE]