Expect your comments

[pandi]

Hi,

Here, I've designed syllabus for C and C++.
This will be helpful for beginners and intermediator.

Please visit here:

http:\\gkpandiblogs.blogspot.com
http://www.blogs.krify.com/ccplusworld

And tell your comments.

 

[Richard Heathfield]

pandi said:

Hi,

Here, I've designed syllabus for C and C++.
This will be helpful for beginners and intermediator.

Please visit here:

http:\\gkpandiblogs.blogspot.com
http://www.blogs.krify.com/ccplusworld

And tell your comments.

Well, my immediate reaction would be simply that I don't recall you being
particularly active in this newsgroup, and "pandi" isn't among the names
that leaps out at me as belonging to a C expert. So perhaps you would be
so kind as to explain why it is worth my time to visit your site. Can you
demonstrate, right here in this newsgroup, an existing knowledge and
understanding of C that is sufficiently encyclopaedic that I can
reasonably believe - against almost all experience - that there might
finally be someone around who can write a decent C tutorial, and thus that
it might be worth the trouble of visiting the site?

 

[loudking]

pandi said:




Well, my immediate reaction would be simply that I don't recall you being
particularly active in this newsgroup, and "pandi" isn't among the names
that leaps out at me as belonging to a C expert. So perhaps you would be
so kind as to explain why it is worth my time to visit your site. Can you
demonstrate, right here in this newsgroup, an existing knowledge and
understanding of C that is sufficiently encyclopaedic that I can
reasonably believe - against almost all experience - that there might
finally be someone around who can write a decent C tutorial, and thus that
it might be worth the trouble of visiting the site?

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

Haha, good answer!

 

[Richard]

Haha, good answer!

You think? It was rude, made assumptions and generally came across as
egotistic ravings from he who feels his position as a C Guru could be
under threat.

It is "indeed" presumptive to say the least, to make being a c.l.c
"regular" a precursor to writing a C tutorial of any sort.

Also, why the author should address anyone here individually in order to
"convince" them to visit the site is beyond me. Visit, look, and do what
you think best based on what you find seems more appropriate to me.

 

[jacob navia]

Hi,

Here, I've designed syllabus for C and C++.
This will be helpful for beginners and intermediator.

Please visit here:

http:\\gkpandiblogs.blogspot.com
http://www.blogs.krify.com/ccplusworld

And tell your comments.

There is a bug somewhere but it is impossible to
access any "lessons" from the blog pages.

There is no obvious way from the table of contents
to the contents.

 

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

Well, my immediate reaction would be simply that I don't recall you being
particularly active in this newsgroup

Indeed, which might explain the failure to distinguish C from C++; the
site seems to focus exclusively on C++.

 

[Richard Heathfield]

Christopher Benson-Manica said:

Well, my immediate reaction would be simply that I don't recall you
being particularly active in this newsgroup

Indeed, which might explain the failure to distinguish C from C++; the
site seems to focus exclusively on C++.

Oh, you actually went there. I was waiting to see if the OP was actually
interested enough in this newsgroup to post a followup to my reply. So far
it appears that he thinks of clc as a dumping ground for advertisements.

 

[Kenny McCormack]

Haha, good answer!

You think? It was rude, made assumptions and generally came across as
egotistic ravings from he who feels his position as a C Guru could be
under threat.[/QUOTE]

Yes, but that's what we do here!

It's what impresses the proles.

 

[Barry Schwarz]

Hi,

Here, I've designed syllabus for C and C++.
This will be helpful for beginners and intermediator.

Your web site is nothing but a list of lesson titles. Until youmake
the text of the lessons available, it has no practical value.

 

[Malcolm McLean]

Can you
demonstrate, right here in this newsgroup, an existing knowledge and
understanding of C that is sufficiently encyclopaedic that I can
reasonably believe - against almost all experience - that there might
finally be someone around who can write a decent C tutorial, and thus that
it might be worth the trouble of visiting the site?

An encyclopedic knowledge of C is something that you can't have. The
standard may be an overlong document, but it is considerably shorter than an
encyclopedia.

 

[jaysome]

Hi,

Here, I've designed syllabus for C and C++.
This will be helpful for beginners and intermediator.

Please visit here:

http:\\gkpandiblogs.blogspot.com
http://www.blogs.krify.com/ccplusworld

And tell your comments.

A chapter named "Language Fundamentals" should not have a lesson
titled "The void main function". Neither in C nor in
an-off-topic-language-for-this-newsgroup like C++.

goto Lesson 2, where you should learn that you should never apply for
a job with me.

Worst regards (mainly said for posting this type of crap to this
newsgroup in the first place)