Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Archive
Archive
C Programming
exponentiation operator (lack of)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="slebetman, post: 2441487"] Which is why, IMHO, I think the current pow() function is better: pow(2,pow(3,4)); In fact, it even avoids confusion with: pow(pow(2,3),4); [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Archive
Archive
C Programming
exponentiation operator (lack of)
Top
