Firebrigade + hoe?

C

Chris Carter

I used newgem to create my 'sparehand' gem. The rakefile now depends
on Hoe, but it also looks like newgem creates a Rakefile such that hoe
can't be a dependency.

I tried adding 'hoe' as a dependency with no luck.

Think someone could offer a little advice? It would make me really
happy to see 'Passed' next to my gem :)

The rakefile is available here:
http://rubyforge.org/viewvc/sparehand/trunk/Rakefile?root=phillyonrails&view=markup

Thanks in advance,
Mat
Hi Mat,
Hoe automatically injects itself as a dependency.
 
M

Mat Schaffer

Hi Mat,
Hoe automatically injects itself as a dependency.

In the 'newgem' case it doesn't. Thanks, Harold, for that blog entry.
That summed it all up. newgem inserts a couple of lines in the
Rakefile that avoid the hoe dependency, but it still requires hoe
without a rescue block, which causes problems if you don't have hoe
and try to test the package.

The solutions I found for firebrigade testing were twofold.
1. Add a test/test_all.rb file that includes all the *_test.rb files.
This allows 'testrb test' to actually run the test cases.
2. Put a begin..rescue LoadError..end block around the hoe portions of
the rake file. and include a test task that runs test_all.rb in the
rescue block.

Based off of tinderbox_gem_build, I think this will work. We'll see
in a little while when firebrigade proper lights up my gem.

Thanks for the help folks. I oughta start a professional blog so I
can blog about this stuff :)
-Mat
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,234
Messages
2,571,178
Members
47,811
Latest member
Adisty

Latest Threads

Top