J
Jamie Orchard-Hays
I'm curious about users' experiences with FreeRide, especially on MacOS
X.
Thanks,
Jamie
X.
Thanks,
Jamie
Jamie said:I'm curious about users' experiences with FreeRide, especially on MacOS X.
Glenn said:on MacOS X.I'm curious about users' experiences with FreeRide, especially
I played with it for a couple of days (on WinXP). I'm afraid that, as a
neophyte Ruby coder, I found it frustrating. My utterly naive Ruby
syntax errors caused it to crash so frequently that I gave up on it and
went back to XEmacs. My feeling is it's not quite ready for prime-time.
Part of this may have resulted from deeper bugs in the Ruby interpreter,
or with irb, since I've experienced a few unforgiving crashes using
irb, as well. This was all using ruby 1.8.2 (2004-11-06) [i386-mswin32].
Glenn said:I played with it for a couple of days (on WinXP). I'm afraid that, as a
neophyte Ruby coder, I found it frustrating. My utterly naive Ruby
syntax errors caused it to crash so frequently that I gave up on it and
went back to XEmacs. My feeling is it's not quite ready for prime-time.
Part of this may have resulted from deeper bugs in the Ruby interpreter,
or with irb, since I've experienced a few unforgiving crashes using
irb, as well. This was all using ruby 1.8.2 (2004-11-06) [i386-mswin32].
A follow-on question:
Does the current source tree for Ruby include test cases with "bad"
code? The idea would be to ensure that Ruby gracefully handles
syntactic and semantic errors.
Part of this may have resulted from deeper bugs in the Ruby interpreter,
or with irb, since I've experienced a few unforgiving crashes using
irb, as well. This was all using ruby 1.8.2 (2004-11-06) [i386-mswin32].
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.