S
snoopy_
I am a system admin, with a little java knowledge, and I am being
asked by a software company to add a the same jar file to CLASSPATH
and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I thought CLASSPATH was used to report to the
JVM about where classes may be located so you can add the class
directories, the jars themselves, or zips for older java archives. I
always thought that the LD_LIBRARY_PATH was for software libraries and
usually pointed to /lib directories that contained ".so" obects.
When I look inside the jar file (jar -tvf jarfile) I do not see any
".so" objects so I am puzzled why they would be added to
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I am thinking this is a typo in the documentation,
but I could be wrong....? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks Snoopy_
asked by a software company to add a the same jar file to CLASSPATH
and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I thought CLASSPATH was used to report to the
JVM about where classes may be located so you can add the class
directories, the jars themselves, or zips for older java archives. I
always thought that the LD_LIBRARY_PATH was for software libraries and
usually pointed to /lib directories that contained ".so" obects.
When I look inside the jar file (jar -tvf jarfile) I do not see any
".so" objects so I am puzzled why they would be added to
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I am thinking this is a typo in the documentation,
but I could be wrong....? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks Snoopy_