J
John Kotuby
Hi all,
Just a little javascript problem here. All the documentation I have seen,
besides showing numerics in the example, such as in history.go(-1), also
mention that if a part of the URL is used then the browser will go to the
nearest history entry with that string in the name of the URL.
Now that I come to think of it, there is no mention as to whether that means
forward or backward. I just assumed backward.
In IE7 the history.go(-1) or history.go(-2) works just fine.
When I replace that syntax with history.go('mysite.com/test.aspx'), which is
where history.go(-1) takes me, and I follow the exact same navigation steps
as before when I click the button that fires the JS, the window just sits at
its current url.
Anyone have an idea what I might be doing wrong?
BTW... I have a reason for using history.go. There may be a better way for
what I am trying to accomplish, but for now I need to know why this
documented feature is not working.
Thanks for any help
Just a little javascript problem here. All the documentation I have seen,
besides showing numerics in the example, such as in history.go(-1), also
mention that if a part of the URL is used then the browser will go to the
nearest history entry with that string in the name of the URL.
Now that I come to think of it, there is no mention as to whether that means
forward or backward. I just assumed backward.
In IE7 the history.go(-1) or history.go(-2) works just fine.
When I replace that syntax with history.go('mysite.com/test.aspx'), which is
where history.go(-1) takes me, and I follow the exact same navigation steps
as before when I click the button that fires the JS, the window just sits at
its current url.
Anyone have an idea what I might be doing wrong?
BTW... I have a reason for using history.go. There may be a better way for
what I am trying to accomplish, but for now I need to know why this
documented feature is not working.
Thanks for any help