M
Mark Asbach
Hi pythonians,
I'm one of the maintainers of an open source image processing toolkit
(OpenCV) and responsible for parts of the autotools setup. The package
mainly consists of four shared libraries but is accompanied by a python
package containing some pure python code and of course extension modules
for the four libraries.
Now during the last month we were preparing a major release which means
testing, fixing, testing, fixing, ... in the first degree. Typical
functionality of the shared libraries is verified during 'make check'
and 'make distcheck' by binaries that are linked against the libraries
(straight forward) and are listed in the 'TESTS' automake primary.
Unfortunately, many problems with the python wrappers arose from time to
time. Currently we have to build and install before we can run any
python-based test routines. When trying to integrate python module
testing into the automake setup, there are some problems that I couldn't
find a solution for:
a) the extension modules are built in different (other) subdirectories -
so they are not in the local path where python could find them
b) the libraries and extension modules are built with libtool and may
have rpaths compiled in (is this problematic)?
c) a different version of our wrappers might be installed on the testing
machine, somewhere in python/site-packages. How can I make sure that
python only finds my 'new' local generated modules?
Since the project is targeted at C/C++ developers in the first degree
and the python wrappers are just an add-on, there is no chance to
migrate it away from automake to someting else (like distutils, etc.).
Did someone solve a similar problem?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
P.S.: I'll post a similar message to the automake mailing list, but
probably python developers are a minority there ...
I'm one of the maintainers of an open source image processing toolkit
(OpenCV) and responsible for parts of the autotools setup. The package
mainly consists of four shared libraries but is accompanied by a python
package containing some pure python code and of course extension modules
for the four libraries.
Now during the last month we were preparing a major release which means
testing, fixing, testing, fixing, ... in the first degree. Typical
functionality of the shared libraries is verified during 'make check'
and 'make distcheck' by binaries that are linked against the libraries
(straight forward) and are listed in the 'TESTS' automake primary.
Unfortunately, many problems with the python wrappers arose from time to
time. Currently we have to build and install before we can run any
python-based test routines. When trying to integrate python module
testing into the automake setup, there are some problems that I couldn't
find a solution for:
a) the extension modules are built in different (other) subdirectories -
so they are not in the local path where python could find them
b) the libraries and extension modules are built with libtool and may
have rpaths compiled in (is this problematic)?
c) a different version of our wrappers might be installed on the testing
machine, somewhere in python/site-packages. How can I make sure that
python only finds my 'new' local generated modules?
Since the project is targeted at C/C++ developers in the first degree
and the python wrappers are just an add-on, there is no chance to
migrate it away from automake to someting else (like distutils, etc.).
Did someone solve a similar problem?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
P.S.: I'll post a similar message to the automake mailing list, but
probably python developers are a minority there ...