I
IloChab
I'd like to implement an object that represents a circular counter, i.e.
an integer that returns to zero when it goes over it's maxVal.
This counter has a particular behavior in comparison: if I compare two of
them an they differ less than half of maxVal I want that, for example,
0 > maxVal gives true.
This is because my different counters grew together and they never
differ a lot between them and so a value of 0 compared with an other of
maxVal means that the previous one just made its increment before the
other one.
The python problem that I give you it's about style.
I'd like to write in my code something that looks almost like using an
integer object.
I mean, I'd like to write:
cnt = CircularConter(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt += 100 # cnt value is 9
print cnt # prints 9
100 > cnt # is false
cnt = 100 # cnt new value is 100 [NOT rebind cnt with 100]
Until now I used this class:
class CircularConter:
def __init__(self, maxVal, initialVal=0):
self.maxVal = maxVal
self.val = None
self.set( initialVal )
def __add__(self, increment):
self.set( self.val + increment )
return self
def __cmp__(self, operand):
return cmp(self.maxVal/2, abs(operand - self.val)) * cmp(self.val,
operand)
def __repr__(self):
return str(self.val)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.val)
def set(self, val):
if val > self.maxVal: self.val = val-self.maxVal-1
else: self.val = val
.... and so my real writing was:
cnt = CircularConter(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt += 100
print cnt
100 > cnt # is false
cnt.set(100)
The fact is that I don't like to write cnt.set(100) or
cnt = CircularConter(100, 100) instead of cnt = 100.
So I thought that property or descriptors could be useful.
I was even glad to write:
cnt = CircularConterWithProperty(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt.val += 100
print cnt.val
100 > cnt.val # is false
cnt.val = 100
just to give uniformity to counter accessing syntax.
But I wasn't able to implement nothing working with my __cmp__ method.
I'll post one of mine NOT WORKING implementation.
class pro(object):
def __init__(self, maxVal, val):
self._maxVal = maxVal
self._val = val
def getval(self):
return self._val
def setval(self, val):
if val > self._maxVal: self._val = val-self._maxVal-1
else: self._val = val
val = property(getval, setval)
class CircularConterWithProperty(pro):
def __init__(self, maxVal, val=0):
super(CircularConterWithProperty, self).__init__( maxVal, val)
def __cmp__(self, operand):
return cmp(self.maxVal/2, abs(operand - self.val)) * cmp(self.val,
operand)
__ I know why this doesn't work. __
__ What I don't know __ is if there is a way to write a class that allows
my desire of uniform syntax or if IT IS JUST A NON SENSE.
I'll thank in advance for any answer.
Saluti a tutti
Licia
an integer that returns to zero when it goes over it's maxVal.
This counter has a particular behavior in comparison: if I compare two of
them an they differ less than half of maxVal I want that, for example,
0 > maxVal gives true.
This is because my different counters grew together and they never
differ a lot between them and so a value of 0 compared with an other of
maxVal means that the previous one just made its increment before the
other one.
The python problem that I give you it's about style.
I'd like to write in my code something that looks almost like using an
integer object.
I mean, I'd like to write:
cnt = CircularConter(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt += 100 # cnt value is 9
print cnt # prints 9
100 > cnt # is false
cnt = 100 # cnt new value is 100 [NOT rebind cnt with 100]
Until now I used this class:
class CircularConter:
def __init__(self, maxVal, initialVal=0):
self.maxVal = maxVal
self.val = None
self.set( initialVal )
def __add__(self, increment):
self.set( self.val + increment )
return self
def __cmp__(self, operand):
return cmp(self.maxVal/2, abs(operand - self.val)) * cmp(self.val,
operand)
def __repr__(self):
return str(self.val)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.val)
def set(self, val):
if val > self.maxVal: self.val = val-self.maxVal-1
else: self.val = val
.... and so my real writing was:
cnt = CircularConter(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt += 100
print cnt
100 > cnt # is false
cnt.set(100)
The fact is that I don't like to write cnt.set(100) or
cnt = CircularConter(100, 100) instead of cnt = 100.
So I thought that property or descriptors could be useful.
I was even glad to write:
cnt = CircularConterWithProperty(maxVal=100, initialVal=10)
cnt.val += 100
print cnt.val
100 > cnt.val # is false
cnt.val = 100
just to give uniformity to counter accessing syntax.
But I wasn't able to implement nothing working with my __cmp__ method.
I'll post one of mine NOT WORKING implementation.
class pro(object):
def __init__(self, maxVal, val):
self._maxVal = maxVal
self._val = val
def getval(self):
return self._val
def setval(self, val):
if val > self._maxVal: self._val = val-self._maxVal-1
else: self._val = val
val = property(getval, setval)
class CircularConterWithProperty(pro):
def __init__(self, maxVal, val=0):
super(CircularConterWithProperty, self).__init__( maxVal, val)
def __cmp__(self, operand):
return cmp(self.maxVal/2, abs(operand - self.val)) * cmp(self.val,
operand)
__ I know why this doesn't work. __
__ What I don't know __ is if there is a way to write a class that allows
my desire of uniform syntax or if IT IS JUST A NON SENSE.
I'll thank in advance for any answer.
Saluti a tutti
Licia