S
Suman
Hello All,
I have never ever thought about this, till recently I cam across a
book (COM/DCOM Primer)
where ':' is referred to as the scope resolution operator used in the
following context:
class Derived : public Base {
....
Now, '::' is what I know of as the scope resolution operator. This
leads me to ask:
[1] Is ':' at all an operator when used in the above context,
[2] If so, does it have a proper name such as colon operator?
[3] Is it correct to refer to it as the scope resolution opeator?
[4] What does the standard say?
Regards,
Suman
I have never ever thought about this, till recently I cam across a
book (COM/DCOM Primer)
where ':' is referred to as the scope resolution operator used in the
following context:
class Derived : public Base {
....
Now, '::' is what I know of as the scope resolution operator. This
leads me to ask:
[1] Is ':' at all an operator when used in the above context,
[2] If so, does it have a proper name such as colon operator?
[3] Is it correct to refer to it as the scope resolution opeator?
[4] What does the standard say?
Regards,
Suman