S
Spydo
I vaguely recall this was asked before so I apologize if its a repeat
but I can't find an answer. Which implies the answer is no. But I'm
hoping I'm wrong..
We have the convenience of @_ defined as( $_[0], $_[1], ... ,$_[-1] )
is there a similar array for @something defined as ( $1, $2, $3, ... ,
$n )
?
if not, it would be useful, since on-occasion I find I need ( $1, $2,
$3, ... ,$n ) which would be more concisely written @something..
Respectfully,
Mr S
but I can't find an answer. Which implies the answer is no. But I'm
hoping I'm wrong..
We have the convenience of @_ defined as( $_[0], $_[1], ... ,$_[-1] )
is there a similar array for @something defined as ( $1, $2, $3, ... ,
$n )
?
if not, it would be useful, since on-occasion I find I need ( $1, $2,
$3, ... ,$n ) which would be more concisely written @something..
Respectfully,
Mr S