Barry said:
And they are extremely *broken*.
This is an established, standard type of URL, which has been in use for
almost as long as the web has been around.[/QUOTE]
Technically speaking, its a pseudo-protocol (or maybe even a protocol).
When was it declared to be "broken"?
Can you link to an *official* standard that defines the mailto: protocol?
And if you had bothered to read the page I gave the URL for, your
question wouldn't have been repeated - its answered in that page.
What if you don't have access to any server-side scripting?
If you have a commercial site without server-side scripting, then you
need to reconsider your hosting situation. If its a personal page, then
you need to go to
www.google.com and search for free email services,
there are way too many out there, that are reliable, that you can use
instead of the broken mailto: protocol.
Client-side mailto links are the standard way to initiate mail
from a web page.
As many forms as I fill out daily to send email, I find that a very
dubious claim. Even AOL offers a formmail script capability for AOL
webpages. Although its limited, its offered for free.
It's silly to require everyone who just wants a simple feedback link to
install a script for it.
No, what is silly is for you to require your visitors to have there
browser set up the way you need it to be set up, in order for your page
to work.
As for needing the email address, I have 8 of them that I regularly use,
if I allow any one of my browsers to setup an email client, which one of
those 8 should it use? And thats 8 permanent ones, I have an unlimited
number of them for my domain name.
As I pointed out, and Richard has also, if you want my email address,
ask for it. If I want you to have it, you will have it. Otherwise, you
won't.