Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Tim Greer, post: 4982131"]
Yes, it was poorly worded, which could imply that, if you are willing to
dismiss the fact I mentioned PHP, SSI, and other options (which clearly
shows I didn't think it was "either browser or had to be in a
framework".Â Â IÂ apologizedÂ forÂ theÂ poorÂ wordingÂ andÂ offeredÂ detailed
clarification.Â Â ThatÂ shouldÂ haveÂ beenÂ theÂ endÂ ofÂ theÂ confusion,Â soÂ from
here it's just arguing about nothing.

The number of regulars?Â Â ItÂ wasÂ youÂ andÂ oneÂ otherÂ personÂ (that'sÂ two
people -- I've had more than that email me saying it's best to ignore
you).Â Â Anyway,Â it'sÂ sortÂ ofÂ difficultÂ toÂ "leaveÂ itÂ atÂ that"Â whenÂ you
two are so persistent on making accusations that compel me to respond
to once again offer clarification.

Those variables are not what dictates an accusation.
Â

I assume that was your own quoted text that you snipped.

Once again, we're back to Pot -> kettle.Â Â TheÂ factÂ is,Â youÂ can'tÂ stand
the thought that I didn't cower to you.Â Â WhatÂ areÂ you,Â theÂ local
newsgroup bully?Â Â ToÂ continuallyÂ pickÂ onÂ someoneÂ andÂ actÂ likeÂ youÂ own
the group, is not just strange, but says that you can't recognize that
you're the very thing you are saying about me.

Only someone with such an ego problem would actually think someone
believes they are more important than they are, all because they don't
put up with your nonsense.Â Â Here'sÂ newsÂ forÂ you.Â Â YouÂ don'tÂ ownÂ meÂ or
this group.Â Â DealÂ withÂ it.Â Â YourÂ actionsÂ hereÂ areÂ unfounded,Â atrocious,
and the actions of a coward.  I could ask what you want out of all of
this, but I doubt even you know.
[/QUOTE]

Verification