[NETBEANS] [EVALUATION] - Summary

[Ilias Lazaridis]

-

[EVALUATION] - E10 - Summary: NetBeans is NOT open source, Sun is...
http://www.netbeans.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=867428&listName=nbusers

-

"
Finally, Sun Microsystems seems to be somehow really extra-ordinary.

Some uncommon definitions of its executive roles / units.

CEO = Chief Extra Ordinary
COO = Chief Opportunism Officer
BOD = Board of Defenders
"
Re: [EVALUATION] - E11 - Sun Microsystems Board of Directors
http://www.netbeans.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=871634&listName=nbusers

-

[NETBEANS] [CENSORSHIP] [Fwd: Returned post for (e-mail address removed)]
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.softwaretools/msg/6ae81d9ae5fac267

-

[NETBEANS] [EVALUATION] - E12 - The NetBeans Open Source Lie
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.softwaretools/msg/633f0a55e520ef24

-

[NETBEANS] [EVALUATION] - E13 - "SPL + BCL = Open Source"
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.softwaretools/msg/d283ea13287d3508

-
-
-

If you are wondering, why the OSI (Open Source Initiative) does not
anything against Sun/NetBeans, take a look on their Board Of Directors:

http://opensource.org/docs/board.php

[Hint: Danese Cooper (Sun Microsystems)]

-

The OSD (Open Source Definition) is a _definition_.

The _definition_ about "OPEN SOURCE" (Point 2) _requires_ _all_ sources
to be open.

http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php

[don't fall into the trap with the libraries. A definition is a definition]

Until the OSI does not clarify its position by adding a part to the
_definition_ which clarifies "how much closed can contain an open source
application", you can savely ignored the institution "OSI".

[I've added this here, cause the OSI is not worth a seperate evaluation.
A little closed converstation with the board has shown the liberal
qualities of the people there: they are not existent.]

..