Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dan Pop, post: 1687037"] My position is that C89 hosted implementations are the *default* for this newsgroup, and hence C89/C90 is the *default* standard for this newsgroup. The reasons should be obvious. When someone wants to talk about C99, this should be explicitly mentioned, just as in the case of K&R C or freestanding implementations. Therefore, it is *unacceptable* to post C99 solutions without *explicitly* qualifying them as such. There is no point in confusing the people who are not intimately familiar with the various C standards. Dan [/QUOTE]