.plx

M

Matt Garrish

Brad Baxter said:

Not true, generally speaking. When you install ActivePerl on a Windoze
system .pl is mapped to the perl executable while .plx gets mapped to the
perlis.dll, which is what I assume he's after.

To our good friend the OP, take your own advice and RTFM to find out why
that makes a difference...

Matt
 
S

Sherm Pendley

Robin said:
What's the difference between .plx and .pl when used with cgi?

In the context of handling a form posting to a web server, .plx is most
commonly used on Windows servers for ISAPI scripts. ISAPI is the IIS
server's moral equivalent of mod_perl.

Unless you've moved to a Windows server, you can't use it. Unless you need
to handle an absurdly high amount of traffic, you don't need it. And unless
you're an advanced Perl programmer, you won't know how to write for it.

In other words, you probably can't use it, almost certainly don't need it,
and definitely aren't (yet) ready for it. So fuhgeddaboudit. ;-)

sherm--
 
B

Brad Baxter

Not true, generally speaking. When you install ActivePerl on a Windoze
system .pl is mapped to the perl executable while .plx gets mapped to the
perlis.dll, which is what I assume he's after.

Hmmm. Wrong twice in one night. I think I'll give it a break.

Regards,

Brad
 
T

Tassilo v. Parseval

Also sprach Jürgen Exner:
The letter "x"


Huh? Why would anyone want to do do that?

Maybe because he asks for it? It's not a violation against usenet
etiquette to request a CCed reply since there'll still be a follow-up in
the group for others to see.

Tassilo
 
R

Robin

Sherm Pendley said:
In the context of handling a form posting to a web server, .plx is most
commonly used on Windows servers for ISAPI scripts. ISAPI is the IIS
server's moral equivalent of mod_perl.

Unless you've moved to a Windows server, you can't use it. Unless you need
to handle an absurdly high amount of traffic, you don't need it. And unless
you're an advanced Perl programmer, you won't know how to write for it.

In other words, you probably can't use it, almost certainly don't need it,
and definitely aren't (yet) ready for it. So fuhgeddaboudit. ;-)

sherm--
actually I know quite a bit about nt servers.... plx would probably be cool
though.
 
R

Robin

Tassilo v. Parseval said:
Also sprach Jürgen Exner:


Maybe because he asks for it? It's not a violation against usenet
etiquette to request a CCed reply since there'll still be a follow-up in
the group for others to see.

gotcha. Thanks- robin
 
S

Sherm Pendley

Robin said:
actually I know quite a bit about nt servers....

.... and little about Perl. You're not ready for advanced Perl topics. Heck,
you're barely beginning to get a grasp on the basics.

sherm--
 
U

Uri Guttman

TM> Do you have any bridges for sale?

i do! and there are no trolls hiding underneath. :)

uri
 
A

Arvin Portlock

Robin said:
What's the difference between .plx and .pl when used with cgi?


Assuming you're running on a Windows machine with IIS as
your webserver and you did the default ActiveState perl
install, the difference should be mostly transparent to
you. You should have had PerlIS installed by default and
the .plx extension mapped to it. So when you write cgi
scripts, just use .plx as the extension and they will auto-
matically run much faster.

If you *didn't* use the default ActiveState install options
then good luck. Unless you do this sort of thing all the time
it's holy hell to get perl and perlIS to work with IIS.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,147
Messages
2,570,837
Members
47,385
Latest member
Joneswilliam01

Latest Threads

Top