private members in internal class

[Glen Able]

So, given something like

class Outer
{
private:

class Inner
{
private:
int m_member;
};
};

Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?

GCC thinks yes, VC6 thinks no.

thanks!
glen.

 

[Christoph Rabel]

class Outer
{
private:

class Inner
{
private:
int m_member;
};
};

Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?

No. Outer isnt allowed to access a private member of a nested class.

hth

Christoph

 

[Chris \( Val \)]

| So, given something like
|
| class Outer
| {
| private:
|
| class Inner
| {
| private:
| int m_member;
| };
| };
|
| Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?
|
| GCC thinks yes, VC6 thinks no.

Unless 'm_member' is static, or there is some kind of
friendship involved, then no, not without an object of
type 'Inner', with an available accessor.

Cheers.
Chris Val

 

[Christoph Rabel]

|
| Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?
|
| GCC thinks yes, VC6 thinks no.

Unless 'm_member' is static, or there is some kind of
friendship involved, then no, not without an object of
type 'Inner', with an available accessor.

What do you mean with static? Even if m_member is static it shouldn't be
accessible.

Christoph?

 

[Chris \( Val \)]

| Chris ( Val ) wrote:
| > | > |
| > | Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?
| > |
| > | GCC thinks yes, VC6 thinks no.
| >
| > Unless 'm_member' is static, or there is some kind of
| > friendship involved, then no, not without an object of
| > type 'Inner', with an available accessor.
|
| What do you mean with static? Even if m_member is static it shouldn't be
| accessible.

Why not ?

Cheers.
Chris Val

 

[Chris Theis]

So, given something like

class Outer
{
private:

class Inner
{
private:
int m_member;
};
};

Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?

GCC thinks yes, VC6 thinks no.

Interesting; which version of GCC thinks so? IIRC VC6 is right on this
point.

Chris

 

[Christoph Rabel]

|
| What do you mean with static? Even if m_member is static it shouldn't be
| accessible.

Why not ?

Because its private.

Christoph

 

[Chris \( Val \)]

| Chris ( Val ) wrote:
| > |
| > | What do you mean with static? Even if m_member is static it shouldn't be
| > | accessible.
| >
| > Why not ?
|
| Because its private.

Oop's ;-).

My apologies - I missed that it was private.
I need some shut eye <G>.

Cheers.
Chris Val

 

[Glen Able]

Should Outer be allowed to access Inner's m_member or not?

Interesting; which version of GCC thinks so? IIRC VC6 is right on this
point.

Chris

It's 2.95 or thereabouts, with some custom bits...

Thanks for all the replies!