Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Vijay L, post: 1731579"] [snip] It appears you don't. [snip] I agree. [big snip] You're taking things to a huge extreme to prove your point. Obviously Raffael, being a programmer himself isn't suggesting that each and every calculation/operation be put in a named function. The best benchmark, is, I guess, the programmer himself. When programming, if you find some portion of code that /you/ feel won't be understand when you're rereading it or, you took a chunk out of a function to debug it and at that point had to give it a name as another function etc etc; /then/ keep that portion aside as a named function. It reduces the burden on the person reading the original function that has been shortened and, _gives him the choice_ to read this other function that has been abstracted in that code. Cheers, Vijay All future commitments are optimistic. [/QUOTE]