B
Borked Pseudo Mailed
Did you bother to comment out *everything* in get_value(),
as opposed to only the logging function, to see whether
QA-C is in fact analysing the function itself? There are
multiple side-effects in that function, since multiple
objects get modified. Giving the function an empty body
would seem to be the most straightforward way of
determining whether QA-C is analysing the function or
simply making guesses on the || operator. In fact, this
idea strikes me as so fucking obvious that I get a sense
of unease I may be completely and utterly wrong.
Yours,
Han from China
as opposed to only the logging function, to see whether
QA-C is in fact analysing the function itself? There are
multiple side-effects in that function, since multiple
objects get modified. Giving the function an empty body
would seem to be the most straightforward way of
determining whether QA-C is analysing the function or
simply making guesses on the || operator. In fact, this
idea strikes me as so fucking obvious that I get a sense
of unease I may be completely and utterly wrong.
Yours,
Han from China