Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Rainer Weikusat, post: 3056179"] I wasn't talking about code but about the defined meaning of certain statements. The statement above has no defined meaning. Ergo: Every claim that its defined meaning would be ... must be wrong. It doesn't matter if the claim is something technically sensible for certain C implementation (like the example I gave above), or some absurd piece of non-sense intended to be entertaining (like the 'nasal daemons'): They are both wrong. BTW, how did you manage to miss that: | This is completely orthogonal to the question what conceivable | behaviour of C-implementations when processing this piece of non-C | could be. And C is again very simple in this respect: Whatever the | behaviour may be, it does not matter. [/QUOTE]