Questions

[ikl]

Is it right to define an array of pointers pointing to a list of objects
like this?

class A
{
};

A* ptr[15];

int i = 0;
for(i=0; i<15; ++i){
ptr = new A();
}

Is it possible to define a list of references referring to a list of
objects?

Thanks!

 

[John Harrison]

Is it right to define an array of pointers pointing to a list of objects
like this?

class A
{
};

A* ptr[15];

int i = 0;
for(i=0; i<15; ++i){
ptr = new A();
}

Whether its right or not depends on your requirements. It's not something I
would recommend to a newbie. You should use a vector.

Is it possible to define a list of references referring to a list of
objects?

It's impossible to create an array of references, which is what I think you
are asking.

john

 

[jonathanmcdougall]

Is it right to define an array of pointers pointing to a list of objects

like this?

class A
{
};

A* ptr[15];

int i = 0;
for(i=0; i<15; ++i){
ptr = new A();
}

"Right" depends on what you want to do. This code compiles fine, and
probably does what you want, except that you forgot to delete the content
of the array :

for (int i=0; i<15; ++i)
delete ptr;

But I would recommend using std::vector :

# include <vector>

class A
{
public:
A(int a, int b);
};

int main()
{
std::vector<A> v;

v.push_back( A() );
v.push_back( A(1, 3) );
}

Look in your textbook for some more informations.

Is it possible to define a list of references referring to a list of
objects?

No.


Jonathan

 

[Kevin Goodsell]

Is it right to define an array of pointers pointing to a list of objects
like this?

class A
{
};

A* ptr[15];

int i = 0;
for(i=0; i<15; ++i){
ptr = new A();
}

If the items are all the same type, as is the case here, then there's no
need for pointers at all. You could simply create the array this way:

A some_array[15];

Or use a std::vector, as others suggested. This is preferable in most
cases, because of the increased flexibility and ease of use.

-Kevin