rb_str_replace not public?

D

Daniel Berger

Hi all,

I wanted to use rb_str_replace for a destructive method in a C
extension I'm using. However, it doesn't appear to be public. Why
not? And what should I use instead?

I poked around intern.h a bit, and saw a few potential candidates, but
wasn't sure if there was a suitable replacement. I suppose I could use
rb_funcall, but that seems wrong, given that I know rb_str_replace
exists in string.c.

Regards,

Dan
 
H

Harpo

Daniel said:
Hi all,
Hi,


I wanted to use rb_str_replace for a destructive method in a C
extension I'm using. However, it doesn't appear to be public. Why
not? And what should I use instead?

I poked around intern.h a bit, and saw a few potential candidates, but
wasn't sure if there was a suitable replacement. I suppose I could
use rb_funcall, but that seems wrong, given that I know rb_str_replace
exists in string.c.

Why not simply :

VALUE str1; // string to replace
VALUE str2; // replacement string

str1 = str2;
[ or, if you want a different object ]
str1 = rb_str_dup( str2 );

Maybe I missed something...
 
D

Daniel Berger

Harpo said:
Daniel said:
Hi all,
Hi,


I wanted to use rb_str_replace for a destructive method in a C
extension I'm using. However, it doesn't appear to be public. Why
not? And what should I use instead?

I poked around intern.h a bit, and saw a few potential candidates, but
wasn't sure if there was a suitable replacement. I suppose I could
use rb_funcall, but that seems wrong, given that I know rb_str_replace
exists in string.c.

Why not simply :

VALUE str1; // string to replace
VALUE str2; // replacement string

str1 = str2;
[ or, if you want a different object ]
str1 = rb_str_dup( str2 );

Maybe I missed something...

In my case I need to replace 'self' within a subclass of String, so I
don't want to dup and I can't do a direct assignment:

irb(main):001:0> class Foo < String; def test; self = "hello"; end; end
SyntaxError: compile error
(irb):1: Can't change the value of self
class Foo < String; def test; self = "hello"; end; end

Thus, I cheat by using String#replace. :)

For now I guess I'll just use rb_funcall, which seems to work fine.

Regards,

Dan
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,200
Messages
2,571,046
Members
47,646
Latest member
xayaci5906

Latest Threads

Top