Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

  • Thread starter S. Justin Gengo
  • Start date
S

S. Justin Gengo

IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no
other browsers need access to your application.

Sincerely,

--
S. Justin Gengo, MCP
Web Developer

Free code library at:
www.aboutfortunate.com

"Out of chaos comes order."
Nietzche
 
S

Seaside

Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact combinations
of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
 
I

IntraRELY

Thanks for the input. User Controls are new to me. I tried the I frame for
my ASP.Net Menu and was a bad way to do it. As I stated the application will
consist of a Menu, that I want to look and function similar to
microsoft.com, however I dont want to reload the whole page, rather just the
conent. Unless someone can advise otherwise. The content will be datagrids
and forms. If there is anything you can add thanks.

Steve Wofford
www.IntraRELY.com
 
L

Lewis Wang [MSFT]

Hi Steve

Here a link about ASP.NET Menu
<http://www.asp.net/ControlGallery/ControlDetail.aspx?Control=124&tabindex=2
Hope this is helpful.

Best regards,
Lewis

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


--------------------
| From: "IntraRELY" <[email protected]>
| References: <#[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
| Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:29:57 -0700
| Lines: 90
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:165985
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| Thanks for the input. User Controls are new to me. I tried the I frame for
| my ASP.Net Menu and was a bad way to do it. As I stated the application
will
| consist of a Menu, that I want to look and function similar to
| microsoft.com, however I dont want to reload the whole page, rather just
the
| conent. Unless someone can advise otherwise. The content will be datagrids
| and forms. If there is anything you can add thanks.
|
| Steve Wofford
| www.IntraRELY.com
|
|
| | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
| > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
| > W3C standards.
| >
| > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
| >
| >
| >
| > Seaside wrote:
| >
| > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
| combinations
| > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > > | > >
| > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
| > >>
| > >>| > >>
| > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as
no
| > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
| > >>>
| > >>>Sincerely,
| > >>>
| > >>>--
| > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
| > >>>Web Developer
| > >>>
| > >>>Free code library at:
| > >>>www.aboutfortunate.com
| > >>>
| > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
| > >>> Nietzche
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>| > >>>
| > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
| > >
| > > developing
| > >
| > >>>an
| > >>>
| > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
| > >
| > > the
| > >
| > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
| > >
| > > Is
| > >
| > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
| > >>>>
| > >>>>TIA,
| > >>>>
| > >>>>Steve Wofford
| > >>>>www.IntraRELY.com
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
| > --
| > Mikael Engdahl
| >
|
|
|
 
L

Lewis Wang [MSFT]

Hi Steve,

I don't see any content in your reply.

I understand the ASP .NET menu mentioned in my previous post is not free.
So, if the issue is not resolved, just let me know. Thanks.

Best regards,
Lewis

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| From: "IntraRELY" <[email protected]>
| References: <#[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
| Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:15:47 -0700
| Lines: 80
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <O#[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:166166
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
|
| | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
| > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
| > W3C standards.
| >
| > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
| >
| >
| >
| > Seaside wrote:
| >
| > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
| combinations
| > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > > | > >
| > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
| > >>
| > >>| > >>
| > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as
no
| > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
| > >>>
| > >>>Sincerely,
| > >>>
| > >>>--
| > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
| > >>>Web Developer
| > >>>
| > >>>Free code library at:
| > >>>www.aboutfortunate.com
| > >>>
| > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
| > >>> Nietzche
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>>| > >>>
| > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
| > >
| > > developing
| > >
| > >>>an
| > >>>
| > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
| > >
| > > the
| > >
| > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
| > >
| > > Is
| > >
| > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
| > >>>>
| > >>>>TIA,
| > >>>>
| > >>>>Steve Wofford
| > >>>>www.IntraRELY.com
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>
| > >>>
| > >>
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
| > --
| > Mikael Engdahl
| >
|
|
|
 
I

IntraRELY

Thanks Lewis,

I am going to use iFrames to hold the datagrids and other various database
bound components. The ASPNet Menu is sitting on the default page and
refreshing the data. I took a look at MS CRM, which my application is very
similar to and they used what looks like a combination of Frames and
IFrames. So I think I made the right decision. User controls, although can
be cached, still presented not truely reusing as a Frame/IFrame only uses
one instance of the object over and over and is what I am aiming for.

Thanks for you help,

Steve Wofford
www.IntraRELY.com
 
L

Lewis Wang [MSFT]

Hi Steve,

Thank you for the update. I'm very glad that the information is helpful.

Best regards,
Lewis

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

--------------------
| From: "IntraRELY" <[email protected]>
| References: <#[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<O#[email protected]>
<#[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
| Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:30:26 -0700
| Lines: 139
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| Message-ID: <#[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
| Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
| Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:167573
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| Thanks Lewis,
|
| I am going to use iFrames to hold the datagrids and other various database
| bound components. The ASPNet Menu is sitting on the default page and
| refreshing the data. I took a look at MS CRM, which my application is very
| similar to and they used what looks like a combination of Frames and
| IFrames. So I think I made the right decision. User controls, although can
| be cached, still presented not truely reusing as a Frame/IFrame only uses
| one instance of the object over and over and is what I am aiming for.
|
| Thanks for you help,
|
| Steve Wofford
| www.IntraRELY.com
|
| | > Hi Steve,
| >
| > I don't see any content in your reply.
| >
| > I understand the ASP .NET menu mentioned in my previous post is not
free.
| > So, if the issue is not resolved, just let me know. Thanks.
| >
| > Best regards,
| > Lewis
| >
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
| rights.
| > --------------------
| > | From: "IntraRELY" <[email protected]>
| > | References: <#[email protected]>
| > <[email protected]>
| > <[email protected]>
| > <[email protected]>
| > <[email protected]>
| > | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
| > | Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:15:47 -0700
| > | Lines: 80
| > | X-Priority: 3
| > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
| > | Message-ID: <O#[email protected]>
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
| > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
| microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:166166
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| > |
| > |
| > | | > | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
| > | > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
| > | > W3C standards.
| > | >
| > | > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > Seaside wrote:
| > | >
| > | > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
| > | combinations
| > | > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | > > | > | > >
| > | > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
| > | > >>
| > | > >>| > | > >>
| > | > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long
| as
| > no
| > | > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>Sincerely,
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>--
| > | > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
| > | > >>>Web Developer
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>Free code library at:
| > | > >>>www.aboutfortunate.com
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
| > | > >>> Nietzche
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
| > | > >
| > | > > developing
| > | > >
| > | > >>>an
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame
| so
| > | > >
| > | > > the
| > | > >
| > | > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt
| change.
| > | > >
| > | > > Is
| > | > >
| > | > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
| > | > >>>>
| > | > >>>>TIA,
| > | > >>>>
| > | > >>>>Steve Wofford
| > | > >>>>www.IntraRELY.com
| > | > >>>>
| > | > >>>>
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>>
| > | > >>
| > | > >
| > | > >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > --
| > | > Mikael Engdahl
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
|
|
|
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,995
Messages
2,570,226
Members
46,815
Latest member
treekmostly22

Latest Threads

Top