:Re: Sizeof and increment operators

[Amit Kulkarni]

The ISO C standard has carefully defined sizeof so that it can be evaluated
to a constant during parsing.

The operand of a sizeof operator is usually not evaluated
(6.5.3.4).

Regards,

Amit Kulkarni

 

[Minti]

The ISO C standard has carefully defined sizeof so that it can be evaluated
to a constant during parsing.

The operand of a sizeof operator is usually not evaluated
(6.5.3.4).

Regards,

Amit Kulkarni

Huh??

 

[Mark McIntyre]

Huh??

Read the reference, FCOL.

6.5.3.4 (2)
"If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is
evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an
integer constant."

 

[Mark McIntyre]

Mark McIntyre wrote:


Read the reference, FCOL.

6.5.3.4 (2)
"If the type of the operand is a variable length array type, the operand is
evaluated; otherwise, the operand is not evaluated and the result is an
integer constant."

Huh?? Why do you think I said "Huh??" at the first place. [/QUOTE]

I think you said Huh? because you didn't understand the point.

BTW could I
borrow your crystal ball. I really really need it to know ahead in what
context the discussion was taking place.

*shrug*. I answered the question you seemd to be asking. If you wanted to
ask a different question, say for instance "how is your remark relevant to
our discussion of pointer arithmetic" or whatever, maybe you should have
asked that instead of grunting....