L
Louis Yeung
Hi,
I am going around circles on the use of parameters in Web Service. I believe
that the parameters should be of primitive type for Web Service interop. If
my method expects 2 input parms (say int and string), modifies them and
returns them to call, how should I define the Web service method in C#? Any
Pro and Con (especially on Interop).
Please remember I am not going after a Web service or else debate. I just
need to know the catch in the following solutions and best practice from
everyone.
1. public void method(ref int in1, ref string in2)
I like this one because it is like RPC and with interop in my own mind.
2. public ClassA method(int in1, string in2) where ClassA {int in1; string
in2;}
Some of our people is against byref in web service method. Your opinion? I
feel this ClassA is redundant. Can interop be an issue when "class" is being
passed around?
3. public string method(int in1, string in2) where string is a XML of the
output
I personally feel like undoing some of the provided plumbing. We have to
decode again.
My starting point may not be 100% correct because the SOA model recommends
you define the Web Service XSD first to ensure interop and develop the Web
service based on the definition. This is why I am keeping to primitive types,
no class.
I am going around circles on the use of parameters in Web Service. I believe
that the parameters should be of primitive type for Web Service interop. If
my method expects 2 input parms (say int and string), modifies them and
returns them to call, how should I define the Web service method in C#? Any
Pro and Con (especially on Interop).
Please remember I am not going after a Web service or else debate. I just
need to know the catch in the following solutions and best practice from
everyone.
1. public void method(ref int in1, ref string in2)
I like this one because it is like RPC and with interop in my own mind.
2. public ClassA method(int in1, string in2) where ClassA {int in1; string
in2;}
Some of our people is against byref in web service method. Your opinion? I
feel this ClassA is redundant. Can interop be an issue when "class" is being
passed around?
3. public string method(int in1, string in2) where string is a XML of the
output
I personally feel like undoing some of the provided plumbing. We have to
decode again.
My starting point may not be 100% correct because the SOA model recommends
you define the Web Service XSD first to ensure interop and develop the Web
service based on the definition. This is why I am keeping to primitive types,
no class.