C
culley harrelson
Does anyone have ruby 1.8 + libraries working from the freebsd ports
tree? I have ruby 1.6 and ruby 1.8 installed from ports but any attempt
to install other ruby ports puts them in the 1.6 library. Upon
installation the 1.8 port says:
==
To build a ruby related port for Ruby 1.8, define RUBY_VER=1.8 on the
make command line or in /etc/make.conf. If you want to use Ruby 1.8
as the default instead of 1.6, define RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.8 also.
==
But this seems to have no effect when, for instance, trying to
re-install ruby-rmail into the 1.8 library. I have updated
/etc/make.conf, tried passing in the parameter to make via portupgrade,
tried making the port without portupgrade and tried setting RUBY_VER and
RUBY_DEFAULT_VER as environment variables.
I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions before I break away from
the ports tree and install these manually. I have also asked on the
freebsd-questions mailing list.
culley
tree? I have ruby 1.6 and ruby 1.8 installed from ports but any attempt
to install other ruby ports puts them in the 1.6 library. Upon
installation the 1.8 port says:
==
To build a ruby related port for Ruby 1.8, define RUBY_VER=1.8 on the
make command line or in /etc/make.conf. If you want to use Ruby 1.8
as the default instead of 1.6, define RUBY_DEFAULT_VER=1.8 also.
==
But this seems to have no effect when, for instance, trying to
re-install ruby-rmail into the 1.8 library. I have updated
/etc/make.conf, tried passing in the parameter to make via portupgrade,
tried making the port without portupgrade and tried setting RUBY_VER and
RUBY_DEFAULT_VER as environment variables.
I wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions before I break away from
the ports tree and install these manually. I have also asked on the
freebsd-questions mailing list.
culley