ruby-dev summary 26385-26467

[SASADA Koichi]

Hi,

This is ruby-dev summary 26385-26467.

[ruby-dev:26421] Subversion

Shugo Maeda proposed that we should use Subversion instead of CVS on the
Ruby development. This proposal was posted to ruby-core too.

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/5296

Most Japanese developers accepted it. Matz accepted it if there is a
tool corresponds to pcl-cvs. Kouhei Sutou created a test repository on
Subverion (*1) which imported current Ruby CVS repository. Akira Tanaka
suggested that annotate (blame) function on Subversion is too slow in
comparison with CVS.

*1) http://www.cozmixng.org/repos/ruby-svn/
[ruby-core:5374] Subversion repository for tests
http://www.ruby-talk.org/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/5374

This issue is still open.


[ruby-dev:26463] String#each_byte and String#each_char

NARUSE, Yui proposed that Ruby HEAD should include following functions.

1) String#each_byte (without block) #=> Array
It's same function as "'string'.unpack('C*')".
2) String#each_char (without block) #=> Array
3) String#each_char (with block) #=> str
String#each_char is same as "'string'.split(//).each".

Matz rejected (1) and (2), because it's not feature for "each". He
agreed to import these method if there are any suitable name.

And Matz accepted String#each_char (with block).

Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA suggested "collect_byte" for this method.

This issue is still open.


Regards,

 

[Ara.T.Howard]

Hi,

This is ruby-dev summary 26385-26467.

[ruby-dev:26421] Subversion

Shugo Maeda proposed that we should use Subversion instead of CVS on the
Ruby development. This proposal was posted to ruby-core too.

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/5296

Most Japanese developers accepted it. Matz accepted it if there is a
tool corresponds to pcl-cvs. Kouhei Sutou created a test repository on
Subverion (*1) which imported current Ruby CVS repository. Akira Tanaka
suggested that annotate (blame) function on Subversion is too slow in
comparison with CVS.

*1) http://www.cozmixng.org/repos/ruby-svn/
[ruby-core:5374] Subversion repository for tests
http://www.ruby-talk.org/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/5374

This issue is still open.


[ruby-dev:26463] String#each_byte and String#each_char

NARUSE, Yui proposed that Ruby HEAD should include following functions.

1) String#each_byte (without block) #=> Array
It's same function as "'string'.unpack('C*')".
2) String#each_char (without block) #=> Array
3) String#each_char (with block) #=> str
String#each_char is same as "'string'.split(//).each".

Matz rejected (1) and (2), because it's not feature for "each". He
agreed to import these method if there are any suitable name.

And Matz accepted String#each_char (with block).

Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA suggested "collect_byte" for this method.

This issue is still open.

String#bytes

String#chars

??

-a
--
===============================================================================
| email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| phone :: 303.497.6469
| My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.
| --Tenzin Gyatso
===============================================================================

 

[Jim Menard]

This is ruby-dev summary 26385-26467.

[ruby-dev:26421] Subversion

Shugo Maeda proposed that we should use Subversion instead of CVS on the
Ruby development. This proposal was posted to ruby-core too.

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/5296

Most Japanese developers accepted it. Matz accepted it if there is a
tool corresponds to pcl-cvs. Kouhei Sutou created a test repository on
Subverion (*1) which imported current Ruby CVS repository. Akira Tanaka
suggested that annotate (blame) function on Subversion is too slow in
comparison with CVS.

For Emacs and Subversion, there's psvn.el (page at
http://xsteve.nit.at/prg/vc_svn/ code at
http://www.xsteve.at/prg/emacs/psvn.el) which is similar to, but not identical
to, pcl-cvs.

Jim

 

[Florian Groß]

String#bytes

String#chars

I like this best and did a RCR for the latter already:

http://www.rcrchive.net/rcr/show/281

Feedback has been positive so far.