B
Bruno Sousa
Where can I find Ruby Version History? I need to check differences
between them.
Regards
between them.
Regards
Where can I find Ruby Version History? I need to check differences
between them.
2009/4/23 Bruno Sousa said:Where can I find Ruby Version History? I need to check differences
between them.
Regards
I am for something like main differences/improvements between stable
versions like 0.95, 1.0, 1.8, 1.9 .
I don't believe those are stored anywhere. You'll have to
construct them from the tags/ directory of the SVN repo.
Ruby's source control system leaves much to be desired. If you
try to checkout tags you'll get gigabytes of mostly redundant
information, which is silly. If you check out trunk you won't get
the tags.
The ruby source code isn't that large. The actual code in trunk
seems to be only about 15M. The compressed history, including
tags and branches, seems to be only about 13M. With a better
source control system you should be able to download and manage the
entire history without wasting much bandwidth or disk space. That
could be very beneficial.
Ruby's source control system leaves much to be desired. If you try
to checkout tags you'll get gigabytes of mostly redundant
information, which is silly. If you check out trunk you won't get
the tags.
The ruby source code isn't that large. The actual code in trunk
seems to be only about 15M. The compressed history, including tags
and branches, seems to be only about 13M. With a better source
control system you should be able to download and manage the entire
history without wasting much bandwidth or disk space. That could
be very beneficial.
Ruby's source control system leaves much to be desired. If you
try to checkout tags you'll get gigabytes of mostly redundant
information, which is silly. If you check out trunk you won't
get the tags.
The ruby source code isn't that large. The actual code in trunk
seems to be only about 15M. The compressed history, including
tags and branches, seems to be only about 13M. With a better
source control system you should be able to download and manage
the entire history without wasting much bandwidth or disk space.
That could be very beneficial.
Why bother checking out everything? Know your tools!
$ svn cat http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_3/ChangeLog
| head
Wed Sep 21 09:07:55 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
* stable version 1.8.3 released.
Wed Sep 21 08:52:25 2005 why the lucky stiff <[email protected]>
* ext/syck/token.c: correctly compute identation of a block
scalar's parent node. [ruby-talk:150620]
Wed Sep 21 08:20:24 2005 Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]>
svn: Can't write to stream: Broken pipe
$ svn diff http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_3/
ChangeLog http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_4/ChangeLog
| head
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog (.../v1_8_3/ChangeLog) (revision 23268)
+++ ChangeLog (.../v1_8_4/ChangeLog) (revision 23268)
@@ -1,3 +1,968 @@
+Sat Dec 24 18:58:14 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
+
+ * stable version 1.8.4 released.
+
+Fri Dec 23 10:30:23 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
diff: standard output: Broken pipe
svn: 'svn_diff_sucks_ass' returned 2
svn: Error reading spooled REPORT request response
Ruby's source control system leaves much to be desired. If you
try to checkout tags you'll get gigabytes of mostly redundant
information, which is silly. If you check out trunk you won't
get the tags.
The ruby source code isn't that large. The actual code in trunk
seems to be only about 15M. The compressed history, including
tags and branches, seems to be only about 13M. With a better
source control system you should be able to download and manage
the entire history without wasting much bandwidth or disk space.
That could be very beneficial.
Why bother checking out everything? Know your tools!
$ svn cat http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_3/ChangeLog
| head
Wed Sep 21 09:07:55 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
* stable version 1.8.3 released.
Wed Sep 21 08:52:25 2005 why the lucky stiff <[email protected]>
* ext/syck/token.c: correctly compute identation of a block
scalar's parent node. [ruby-talk:150620]
Wed Sep 21 08:20:24 2005 Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]>
svn: Can't write to stream: Broken pipe
$ svn diff http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_3/
ChangeLog http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_4/ChangeLog
| head
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog (.../v1_8_3/ChangeLog) (revision 23268)
+++ ChangeLog (.../v1_8_4/ChangeLog) (revision 23268)
@@ -1,3 +1,968 @@
+Sat Dec 24 18:58:14 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
+
+ * stable version 1.8.4 released.
+
+Fri Dec 23 10:30:23 2005 Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>
diff: standard output: Broken pipe
svn: 'svn_diff_sucks_ass' returned 2
svn: Error reading spooled REPORT request response
svn: 'svn_diff_sucks_ass' returned 2
I do. That's why I avoid using that tool. Look at your example.
How am I supposed to know in advance to look in the directory tags/
v1_8_4/ChangeLog unless I get that information from somewhere else?
Also, If I need that version I'm going to have to download the whole
thing rather than just use a cheap local delta. A better tool would
give me all the information I need without external source, without
lots of disk space, and without lots of bandwidth.
Sadly, my access to unicorns is limited.unicorns!
Sadly, my access to unicorns is limited.
So I guess your magical tool doesn't exist either.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.