Rubys License

[cypher.dp]

Hello everybody !

I was just looking up something on the OSI website when I saw that the
Ruby license isn't listed there. Because I was wondering about that I
had a look at the license:

You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
(see COPYING.txt file), or the conditions below

Q: Is Ruby know under the GPLv2 or GPLv3 ?

Kind regards

Dominik

 

[Gregory Brown]

Hello everybody !

I was just looking up something on the OSI website when I saw that the
Ruby license isn't listed there. Because I was wondering about that I
had a look at the license:

You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
(see COPYING.txt file), or the conditions below

Q: Is Ruby know under the GPLv2 or GPLv3 ?

Ruby is disjunctively licensed between Matz's Terms and the GPLV2:
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt

The only reason it's not listed on the OSI site is (AFAIK) no one has
sought their official approval.

However, a while ago I talked with the FSF to get their approval, and
I'm not sure if others did as well, but at any rate, it is listed as a
GPL compatible Free Software license due to the explicit dual
licensing with the GPL.

http://www.fsf.org/licensing

For this reason, I *assume* that means that it meets the OSI
definition as well, but I don't much pay attention to them.

But in short, Ruby is Free and Open Source software...

-greg

 

[Josef 'Jupp' Schugt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi!

You can redistribute it and/or modify it under either the terms of the GPL
(see COPYING.txt file), or the conditions below

Q: Is Ruby know under the GPLv2 or GPLv3 ?

Ruby does not specify the GPL version therefore applies

"…If the Program does not specify a version number of this License,
you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software
Foundation…"

Alternative license has already been mentioned by Gregory Brown.

IANAL but HTH,

Josef 'Jupp' Schugt
- --
Blog available at http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-schugtjo/blog/
PGP key with id 6CC6574F available at http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGlWbgrhv7B2zGV08RAmzsAJ4ryQ6omlZ9E7B5PSMWs9VDjb+LhwCfUkAA
Ug46s4tz6YguDzciiIP4yo8=
=CaHf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists]

Ruby is disjunctively licensed between Matz's Terms and the GPLV2:
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt

The only reason it's not listed on the OSI site is (AFAIK) no one has
sought their official approval.

However, a while ago I talked with the FSF to get their approval, and
I'm not sure if others did as well, but at any rate, it is listed as a
GPL compatible Free Software license due to the explicit dual
licensing with the GPL.

http://www.fsf.org/licensing

For this reason, I *assume* that means that it meets the OSI
definition as well, but I don't much pay attention to them.

But in short, Ruby is Free and Open Source software...

It meets the DFSG too, which are pretty strict, otherwise it wouldn't be
in Debian proper.
*t

 

[Chad Perrin]

Ruby is disjunctively licensed between Matz's Terms and the GPLV2:
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt

The only reason it's not listed on the OSI site is (AFAIK) no one has
sought their official approval.

There are costs associated with OSI approval. It is, thus, probably in
part the matter of money that has prevented the Ruby license from being
listed there.

 

[Josef 'Jupp' Schugt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ruby does not specify the GPL version therefore applies

Hmm, seems to depend on the Ruby version.
Recent Ruby versions state GPL 2, License on ruby-talk doesn't.

Josef 'Jupp' Schugt
- --
Blog available at http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-schugtjo/blog/
PGP key with id 6CC6574F available at http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGlWuurhv7B2zGV08RAl4cAJ0Sikhj86OK0rUb+Dov12+32PzgoACcCCGb
DzoN6w9savQC/xQDapA719o=
=pmls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Gregory Brown]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hmm, seems to depend on the Ruby version.
Recent Ruby versions state GPL 2, License on ruby-talk doesn't.

Right, I brought this up maybe a year ago and Matz decided to lock it
to GPLv2 (which is a smart move, as the 'or any later version' clause
is viral)

He said he was considering moving to GPL3 when it became finalized.
I've not asked what he thinks, and honestly haven't decided what I
think about GPL 3