RUDL and segfaulting

[nornagon]

Hi all.

When I try to use RUDL, after working around the rubygems problem, I
tried to run some of the samples. Most of them seemed to work fine,
except for the fact that they like to exit by segfaulting.

Me: "You're CLOSED!"
RUDL: "You can't close me because *I* segfault!!"

So yeah. Any clues?
--=20
- nornagon

 

[Tom Copeland]

Hi all.

When I try to use RUDL, after working around the rubygems problem, I
tried to run some of the samples. Most of them seemed to work fine,
except for the fact that they like to exit by segfaulting.

Me: "You're CLOSED!"
RUDL: "You can't close me because *I* segfault!!"

So yeah. Any clues?

I ran into some odd behavior with RUDL a while back; it sort of went
away after I added a method_missing implementation in the extension
code. Details are here:

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/107693

Yours,

Tom

 

[nornagon]

=20
I ran into some odd behavior with RUDL a while back; it sort of went
away after I added a method_missing implementation in the extension
code. Details are here:
=20
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/107693
=20

Hmm, that seems not to work.

I applied the patch, and:

$ ruby urlaubtris.rb=20
(eval):118: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i686-linux]

Aborted

(I got that before the patch, too.)

And it still segfaults rather than quitting :/

--=20
- nornagon