D
Duncan Findlay
Suppose I've got a Python daemon that spawns a bunch of worker threads, waits for a singal (e.g. SIGTERM) and then shuts down the worker threads gracefully. What's the simplest way to do the signal handling portably across as many operating systems as possible (at least Linux and FreeBSD). Specifically, I'm interested in solutions where the main thread consumes no CPU, so no time.sleep(n) loops.
The most obvious solution (below) does not work with on FreeBSD, because the signal gets delivered to a different thread and signal.pause() doesn't return.
_shutdown = False
def sig_handler(signum, frame):
print 'handled'
global _shutdown
_shutdown = True
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Set up signal handling.
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, sig_handler)
# Start worker threads.
workers = [Worker() for i in xrange(NUM_THREADS)]
for worker in workers:
worker.start()
# Sleep until woken by a signal.
while not _shutdown:
signal.pause()
# Shutdown work threads gracefully.
for worker in workers:
worker.shutdown()
Any ideas? I've attached a more complete code sample.
Thanks
Duncan Findlay
The most obvious solution (below) does not work with on FreeBSD, because the signal gets delivered to a different thread and signal.pause() doesn't return.
_shutdown = False
def sig_handler(signum, frame):
print 'handled'
global _shutdown
_shutdown = True
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Set up signal handling.
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, sig_handler)
# Start worker threads.
workers = [Worker() for i in xrange(NUM_THREADS)]
for worker in workers:
worker.start()
# Sleep until woken by a signal.
while not _shutdown:
signal.pause()
# Shutdown work threads gracefully.
for worker in workers:
worker.shutdown()
Any ideas? I've attached a more complete code sample.
Thanks
Duncan Findlay