speed of python 2.4

[Wilk]

Hi,

In the page http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/whatsnew/node7.html
the last sentence says :
The net result of the 2.4 optimizations is that Python 2.4 runs the
pystone benchmark around XX% faster than Python 2.3 and YY% faster than
Python 2.2

What is the value of XX and YY ?

 

[Peter Hansen]

Hi,

In the page http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/whatsnew/node7.html
the last sentence says :
The net result of the 2.4 optimizations is that Python 2.4 runs the
pystone benchmark around XX% faster than Python 2.3 and YY% faster than
Python 2.2

What is the value of XX and YY ?

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

The value of XX and YY, however, is unlikely to be known accurately
until there *is* a 2.4, rather than merely an alpha for 2.4. Alphas
generally contain things that are not in the final release, sometimes
debugging or logging code, sometimes experimental things, sometimes
things that are implemented only in an early form and are expected
to change.

-Peter

 

[Tim Peters]

[Wilk]

In the page http://www.python.org/dev/doc/devel/whatsnew/node7.html
the last sentence says :
The net result of the 2.4 optimizations is that Python 2.4 runs the
pystone benchmark around XX% faster than Python 2.3 and YY% faster than
Python 2.2

What is the value of XX and YY ?

How embarrassing! We got those interchanged -- it should have said
"Python 2.4 runs the pystone benchmark around YY% faster than Python
2.3 and XX% faster than Python 2.2". We didn't specify the number
system because if you knew the decimal equivalents it would just lead
to silly arguments, of which comp.lang.python has had quite enough
recently <wink>.

 

[Jacek Generowicz]

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.



[*] Note:

a) Quoted "What"

b) No question mark

 

[Roy Smith]

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.



[*] Note:

a) Quoted "What"

b) No question mark

Who's on first?

 

[Peter Hansen]

You need to fix your parser.

Or others can fix their humour detector... which is supposed to
be helped along by the friendly winky...

 

[John Lenton]

What is the value of XX and YY ?

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.

Who's on first?

That's what I want to find out.

 

[Jacek Generowicz]

Or others can fix their humour detector... which is supposed to
be helped along by the friendly winky...

We're in danger of starting an infinitely recursive, self-referential
tower of posts here ... if you get my drift ;-)

 

[Aahz]

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.

Who's on first?

That's what I want to find out.

I Don't Know

 

[Nigel Rowe]

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.

Who's on first?

That's what I want to find out.

I Don't Know

Third base.

 

[Christian Tismer]

No, "what" is a word that is used to introduce some types of
questions. ;-)

You need to fix your parser.

If he had written '"What" is the value of XX and YY'[*], then your
parse would have been valid.

I appreciate your attempt to be funny, but you are not
successful. Instead, this unfruitful thread is continued.

stop it until the real thing is there -- chris

--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/

 

[Marco Aschwanden]

Who's on first?

I Don't Know

http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/whoson.htm

Have a nice day,
Marco