std::parallel?

[Kenshin]

Given high level parallel task libraries like Intel TBB, STAPL, Cilk+
+, VC++ PPL, OpenMP (with current explicit task constructs), & also
given C++’s system of standardizing existing widespread practice, is
it too early to tell which of these libraries will form a base of a
future C++ standard parallel library?

 

[Chris M. Thomasson]

Given high level parallel task libraries like Intel TBB, STAPL, Cilk+
+, VC++ PPL, OpenMP (with current explicit task constructs), & also
given C++’s system of standardizing existing widespread practice, is
it too early to tell which of these libraries will form a base of a
future C++ standard parallel library?

You can a build high speed tasking system with pure C++0x. Of course it will
be recursive in nature. If you want to build a _really_ high speed tasking
system, you need OS specific "features".

 

[Chris M. Thomasson]

Given high level parallel task libraries like Intel TBB, STAPL, Cilk+
+, VC++ PPL, OpenMP (with current explicit task constructs), & also
given C++’s system of standardizing existing widespread practice, is
it too early to tell which of these libraries will form a base of a
future C++ standard parallel library?

You can a build high speed tasking system with pure C++0x. Of course it will
be recursive in nature. If you want to build a _really_ high speed tasking
system, you need OS specific "features".